Many of you know by now that the CAP is circulating a letter asking that you identify yourselves and give permission for them to forward a questionnaire to you and that they proceed with the process of certifying PAs. I encourage you to respond forthwith.
Further, I'd suggest that you forward this information to any PAs who may not have received the CAP's communique. This is very important. They may not be called "Pathologists' Assistants" but if they're describing surgical specimens and/or performing autopsies (the dissection of the organs) then they are PAs in the view of the CAP. Part of the process is going to be rationalizing the definition of the profession. It will be far better for as many individuals as possible to be involved at the outset rather than after the fact.
Please use this site as a common site for your comments and responses. It is high time that the PAs of this country begin this necessary process. It is time for you to get involved.
Think of it...a few AGMs from now, we could be meeting in Florida, in February!
Monday, January 31, 2005
Sunday, January 30, 2005
A Little Background
For those of you who are reading this who may not be familiar with Pathologists' Assistants and what they do, I thought that a little background, history really, might be appreciated.
In the late '60s, as a result of decreased medical school class sizes, the number of medical residents in all specialties, Pathology included, decreased dramatically. This was a continental phenomenon. At the same time, partially due to deficit financing, tertiary care hospitals were growing in leaps and bounds. The number of surgeries was climbing and the number of in-patient beds grew considerably. With the increase in surgeries, the number of specimens to be examined in Surgical Pathology also increased. The examination of these was, in teaching hospitals, traditionally a task assigned to pathology residents.
Very soon after the creation and recognition of the profession of Physician Assistant (Duke University, 1965), the profession of Pathologists' Assistant was also created (also at Duke U.). Post-baccalauriate curricula (2-yr) for the training of PAs was at 5 American universities at that time and successful graduates wrote a fellowship exam and became Registered PAs. However, national certification did not exist and the American Association of Pathologists' Assistants (AAPA) has been working diligently for the last several years to gain national certification for PAs in the USA. There are a large number of on-the-job trained (OJT) PAs, possibly more numerous than graduates of the accredited university programs.
The tasks which PAs perform are those which have always been the responsibility of physicians. In Canada the provincial ministries of health continue to mandate pathologists or pathology residents to perform the tasks which at most larger hospitals are performed by PAs. It is important that PAs gain recognition and, with that recognition, regulation for the sake of public safety (indeed for the protection of the PAs themselves, the Pathologists, the departments of Laboratory Medicine and the hospitals). Educational standards and minimum pre-requisites must be set. Provincial regulatory colleges, although recognising the existance of PAs, have not yet been mandated to regulate the profession. PAs, who are largely drawn from Medical Laboratory Technologist stock, realize that they are functioning far beyond the scope that their credentials would ordinarily allow.
To place the profession of Pathologists' Assistant in the rather bewildering heirarchy of para-medical personnel, one might do well to think of professions like Nurse Practitioners, Physician Assistant, Midwife and others who are performing the tasks which have heretofore been solely the responsibility of medical doctors.
I have been fortunate to enter the profession while it was still in its infancy. I have watched -- and have been instrumental in developing -- its maturation. It has been an evolution of sorts wherein over the years, more and more responsibilities were gradually taken on by myself and the slowly-growing number of other PAs at The Ottawa Hospital. As the PAs earned the trust of the Pathologists, the level of responsibility grew and grew. Now thirty years into their evolution, PAs are undeniably an integral, necessary part of the division of Pathology. But there's more; it has been recognised that PAs actually provide a superior level of quality of 'product' than the medical doctors themselves. Oncologists and surgeons realize that their patients are better served if the specimens are examined by PAs.
In many provinces, the degree to which Laboratory Technologists work is monitored by workload units. There is a precise listing of all functions, each given a unit value which is primarily based on time. Despite the 30-existence of PAs, their workload is still not recognised. It is the duty of the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) to maintain, administer and upgrade the unit structure (called the MIS Guidelines). In 2003, I submitted a lengthy application to the CIHI to have the tasks which are performed by PAs credited. It has been 1 1/2 years and PAs are still waiting. Their recognition which their profession deserves will be advanced significantly if/when the CIHI eventually approves the application. I am truly hopeful that this will happen some time before I retire.
In the late '60s, as a result of decreased medical school class sizes, the number of medical residents in all specialties, Pathology included, decreased dramatically. This was a continental phenomenon. At the same time, partially due to deficit financing, tertiary care hospitals were growing in leaps and bounds. The number of surgeries was climbing and the number of in-patient beds grew considerably. With the increase in surgeries, the number of specimens to be examined in Surgical Pathology also increased. The examination of these was, in teaching hospitals, traditionally a task assigned to pathology residents.
Very soon after the creation and recognition of the profession of Physician Assistant (Duke University, 1965), the profession of Pathologists' Assistant was also created (also at Duke U.). Post-baccalauriate curricula (2-yr) for the training of PAs was at 5 American universities at that time and successful graduates wrote a fellowship exam and became Registered PAs. However, national certification did not exist and the American Association of Pathologists' Assistants (AAPA) has been working diligently for the last several years to gain national certification for PAs in the USA. There are a large number of on-the-job trained (OJT) PAs, possibly more numerous than graduates of the accredited university programs.
The tasks which PAs perform are those which have always been the responsibility of physicians. In Canada the provincial ministries of health continue to mandate pathologists or pathology residents to perform the tasks which at most larger hospitals are performed by PAs. It is important that PAs gain recognition and, with that recognition, regulation for the sake of public safety (indeed for the protection of the PAs themselves, the Pathologists, the departments of Laboratory Medicine and the hospitals). Educational standards and minimum pre-requisites must be set. Provincial regulatory colleges, although recognising the existance of PAs, have not yet been mandated to regulate the profession. PAs, who are largely drawn from Medical Laboratory Technologist stock, realize that they are functioning far beyond the scope that their credentials would ordinarily allow.
To place the profession of Pathologists' Assistant in the rather bewildering heirarchy of para-medical personnel, one might do well to think of professions like Nurse Practitioners, Physician Assistant, Midwife and others who are performing the tasks which have heretofore been solely the responsibility of medical doctors.
I have been fortunate to enter the profession while it was still in its infancy. I have watched -- and have been instrumental in developing -- its maturation. It has been an evolution of sorts wherein over the years, more and more responsibilities were gradually taken on by myself and the slowly-growing number of other PAs at The Ottawa Hospital. As the PAs earned the trust of the Pathologists, the level of responsibility grew and grew. Now thirty years into their evolution, PAs are undeniably an integral, necessary part of the division of Pathology. But there's more; it has been recognised that PAs actually provide a superior level of quality of 'product' than the medical doctors themselves. Oncologists and surgeons realize that their patients are better served if the specimens are examined by PAs.
In many provinces, the degree to which Laboratory Technologists work is monitored by workload units. There is a precise listing of all functions, each given a unit value which is primarily based on time. Despite the 30-existence of PAs, their workload is still not recognised. It is the duty of the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) to maintain, administer and upgrade the unit structure (called the MIS Guidelines). In 2003, I submitted a lengthy application to the CIHI to have the tasks which are performed by PAs credited. It has been 1 1/2 years and PAs are still waiting. Their recognition which their profession deserves will be advanced significantly if/when the CIHI eventually approves the application. I am truly hopeful that this will happen some time before I retire.
Saturday, January 29, 2005
Ontario Lab Accreditation
Somewhat miraculously, we survived the week-long QMPLS Ont. Lab. Accreditation visit last week. Of the 550 odd requirements, we ended-up with 6 major non-compliances and 63 minor non-compliances at the Civic Campus, slightly fewer at the General Campus and even fewer at the Riverside Campus. As many of you in Ontario already know, we now have 90 days to eliminated the majors and to show, at the least, a plan to eliminate the minors, in order to attain a 5-year accreditation before we have to endure another dose of regulatory bureucratic BS.
I guess the accreditors can't help themselves but to eventually become somewhat obsessive; it's the nature of the beast. We shouldn't fault them I suppose. Funny though, of the 27 Pathologists at The Ottawa Hospital, I don't know of one who would ever voluntarily choose to become an OLA Assessor. They, like me, are there to provide the best quality patient care that they can to each and every patient whose specimen is sent to our division. Different strokes for different folks I guess. It's difficult to not 'shoot the messanger' though.
I have no doubt that we will satisfy OLA and will attain a 5-year accreditation, but wow, what a process! I'm sure I have a lot more grey hair now than a few months ago.
I wish anyone who is preparing for an upcoming OLA assessment the best of luck. Don't fool yourself into thinking that you'll be perfect. It's not possible. Just do your best and deal with the hopefully few non-comformances afterwards.
More on OLA later.
I guess the accreditors can't help themselves but to eventually become somewhat obsessive; it's the nature of the beast. We shouldn't fault them I suppose. Funny though, of the 27 Pathologists at The Ottawa Hospital, I don't know of one who would ever voluntarily choose to become an OLA Assessor. They, like me, are there to provide the best quality patient care that they can to each and every patient whose specimen is sent to our division. Different strokes for different folks I guess. It's difficult to not 'shoot the messanger' though.
I have no doubt that we will satisfy OLA and will attain a 5-year accreditation, but wow, what a process! I'm sure I have a lot more grey hair now than a few months ago.
I wish anyone who is preparing for an upcoming OLA assessment the best of luck. Don't fool yourself into thinking that you'll be perfect. It's not possible. Just do your best and deal with the hopefully few non-comformances afterwards.
More on OLA later.
Certification Update
I am very pleased to announce that, thanks in no small part to the efforts of Dr. J. Thomas, who sits on the executive of the Can. Assoc. of Pathologists, the President, Dr. Cook (Memorial U., Newfoundland & Labrador) has begun the survey of the nation's PAs. He has circulated a letter to all Directors of Departments of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine asking to identify all those who may be functioning as Pathologists' Assistants. Regrettably, this is re-doing the efforts of the CSMLS who, through an independent consultant, already circulated a questionnaire to all Canadian PAs. They dropped the ball on the issue of national certification of PAs however and failed to keep the mailing list.
Once all individuals are identified, a questionnaire will be circulated to Canada's PAs.
The CAP recognises the importance of training and regulation of PAs and it is to this end that they have embarked on this process. The CMA Accreditation office has expressed an interest in PAs and is eager to provide assistance when that stage is reached.
The first step of listing PAs has begun and that's an important step in the right direction.
Once all individuals are identified, a questionnaire will be circulated to Canada's PAs.
The CAP recognises the importance of training and regulation of PAs and it is to this end that they have embarked on this process. The CMA Accreditation office has expressed an interest in PAs and is eager to provide assistance when that stage is reached.
The first step of listing PAs has begun and that's an important step in the right direction.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
